Skip to content
STATEOF WATCH

Corrections ledger · through v3.33

What we got wrong, and what replaced it

Most outlets bury corrections in a footnote. Here they're a feature: each one shows the old text, the new text, a word-level diff, and why it changed. Some entries are the opposite, a doubt we checked that turned out to be wrong, and they stay on the record too.

31 corrected2 retracted6 doubts checked

v3.32

Corrected

The D.C. Circuit did rule on IRS-to-ICE address sharing

Was

Retracted as "D.C. court initially allows IRS sharing" (Feb. 25/26, 2026) because no matching ruling had been found.

Now

On Feb. 24, 2026, the D.C. Circuit affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction and held that federal tax law permits IRS to disclose taxpayer addresses to ICE only in response to written requests that meet the statute's requirements.

+ Show word diff

Retracted as "On Feb. 24, 2026, the D.C. court initially allowsCircuit affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction and held that federal tax law permits IRS sharing" (Febto disclose taxpayer addresses to ICE only in response to written requests that meet the statute's requirements. 25/26, 2026) because no matching ruling had been found.

Why: The ruling is Centro de Trabajadores Unidos v. Bessent, No. 25-5181. A later D.C. Circuit opinion cited it, leading us to the full opinion. The old date and "initially allows" wording were inaccurate, but the underlying event was real.

D.C. Circuit says federal tax law permits IRS-to-ICE address sharing →

v3.32

Corrected

DHS took down its facial-recognition directive in February 2025, then expanded use

Was

DHS deleted its facial-recognition oversight policy, dated February 2026, without explaining what happened before or after the takedown.

Now

DHS removed Directive 026-11 from its website in February 2025. It called the removal routine website maintenance and denied a policy change, but had not publicly replaced the directive a year later. DHS fast-tracked Mobile Fortify less than two months after the directive disappeared, and the Brennan Center still found no clear public governing policy as of July 2026 while biometric deployment and spending expanded.

+ Show word diff

DHS deleted its facialremoved Directive 026-recognition oversight11 from its website in February 2025. It called the removal routine website maintenance and denied a policy change, dated February 2026, without explaining what happened before orbut had not publicly replaced the directive a year later. DHS fast-tracked Mobile Fortify less than two months after the takedowndirective disappeared, and the Brennan Center still found no clear public governing policy as of July 2026 while biometric deployment and spending expanded.

Why: Direct reads of WIRED, Biometric Update and the Brennan Center corrected the date and supplied the missing sequence. The earlier proposed correction overemphasized the technical distinction between public removal and formal rescission; that distinction did not explain the continuing absence of public guardrails or the expansion that followed.

DHS takes down its facial-recognition directive, calls it website maintenance as use expands →

v3.32

Corrected

Brennan surveillance tally: publication date and current category totals

Was

The entry was dated July 29, 2026, remained partial because the report had not been fetched directly, and included a $1.36 billion second-term total and $95 million social-media figure that are not in the current report.

Now

The Brennan Center published the report Sept. 16, 2026, using data current through July 26. Its current chart reports more than $2.9 billion total: $1.1 billion biometrics, $793.2 million video surveillance, $622.8 million data analytics, $228.6 million data purchases, $130.4 million phone-content access and $44.8 million location tracking.

+ Show word diff

The entry was dated July 29, 2026, remained partial becauseBrennan Center published the report had not been fetched directlySept. 16, and included a2026, using data current through July 26. Its current chart reports more than $2.9 billion total: $1.361 billion secondbiometrics, $793.2 million video surveillance, $622.8 million data analytics, $228.6 million data purchases, $130.4 million phone-term totalcontent access and $9544.8 million social-media figure that are not in the current reportlocation tracking.

Why: The live report and interactive charts were read directly Oct. 3, 2026. The entry now reports the source's own current figures and distinguishes publication date from the data cutoff.

Brennan Center: DHS committed at least $2.9B to surveillance and data →

v3.31

Doubt checked, claim holds

ICE's 287(g) coordination center exists

Was

Listed as unconfirmed. Unconfirmed. Related but distinct: the Javorsky complaint alleges California ALPR data reached over 300 out-of-state agencies including 287(g) participants. That is about Flock data sharing, not evidence for a dedicated "287(g) coordination center."

Now

ICE hired Koniag Services to run its 287(g) National Coordination Center: task order signed July 28, 2026, $17.5 million obligated, up to $63.0 million with options through August 2030.

+ Show word diff

Listed as unconfirmed. Unconfirmed. Related but distinct: the Javorsky complaint alleges California ALPR data reached over 300 out-of-state agencies includingICE hired Koniag Services to run its 287(g) participantsNational Coordination Center: task order signed July 28, 2026, $17. That is about Flock data sharing5 million obligated, not evidence for a dedicated "287(g) coordination centerup to $63."0 million with options through August 2030.

Why: Federal award record 70CDCR26FR0000034 (USAspending), found through Project Salt Box's Sept 18 report and Tennessee Lookout's Aug 11 report.

ICE hires a contractor to run a national 287(g) coordination center →

v3.31

Corrected

Palantir's DHS deal: which agencies were named for what

Was

CBP, ICE, FEMA, and CISA skip competitive bidding. The CTO pitched expansion to the Secret Service and TSA internally.

Now

Orders under the agreement need no separate competition; WIRED named CBP and ICE as able to "essentially skip the competitive bidding process." Palantir's CTO, Akash Jain, named the Secret Service, FEMA, TSA and CISA in an internal email as places to expand.

+ Show word diff

Orders under the agreement need no separate competition; WIRED named CBP, ICE, FEMA, and CISAICE as able to "essentially skip the competitive bidding process. The" Palantir's CTO pitched expansion to, Akash Jain, named the Secret Service and, FEMA, TSA internallyand CISA in an internal email as places to expand.

Why: WIRED's article puts FEMA and CISA on the CTO's expansion list, not the bidding list.

DHS signs a $1 billion buying agreement with Palantir →

v3.31

Corrected

TechCrunch did not report that the leaked DHS files look genuine

Was

DHS never confirmed a breach; cybersecurity researchers told TechCrunch the files look genuine.

Now

DHS and ICE did not respond to TechCrunch's request for comment, and we have found no independent authentication of the data.

+ Show word diff

DHS never confirmed a breach; cybersecurity researchers toldand ICE did not respond to TechCrunch's request for comment, and we have found no independent authentication of the files look genuinedata.

Why: TechCrunch's article, in its first archived copy (Mar 2, 2026) and as updated Mar 4, has no such statement. The line came from stateofsurveillance.org, which attributed it to TechCrunch.

Hackers leak DHS contracting data naming 6,681 companies and groups →

v3.31

Corrected

The DIA did not confirm buying location data

Was

DIA confirmed the same.

Now

Asked the same question, DIA Director James Adams did not say whether DIA still buys location data; he said its purchases of commercially available information go through legal channels and follow the law.

+ Show word diff

DIA confirmedAsked the same question, DIA Director James Adams did not say whether DIA still buys location data; he said its purchases of commercially available information go through legal channels and follow the law.

Why: Biometric Update's account of the hearing: Adams "did not give a yes-or-no answer on current purchasing."

FBI Director confirms warrantless purchase of Americans' location data →

v3.31

Corrected

The Army's Clearview licenses are not documented as "analysts only"

Was

Scale: 5 licenses, about $339k, analysts only.

Now

Five licenses, bought through the reseller Octaris Technologies: $78,750 for the first year, up to $339,415 with options through March 2030. The records do not say who uses them.

+ Show word diff

Scale: 5Five licenses, aboutbought through the reseller Octaris Technologies: $339k78, analysts only750 for the first year, up to $339,415 with options through March 2030. The records do not say who uses them.

Why: "Analysts" was Biometric Update's inference from the seat count and delivery address; the Army's award record and solicitation do not say it.

Army Special Forces command renews Clearview AI facial recognition →

v3.31

Corrected

Mobile Fortify: two separate cases, not misidentified US citizens

Was

Documented misidentifications of US citizens (Oregon, Oct 2025).

Now

A CBP official testified that the app returned two different, incorrect names for a woman detained in Oregon (404 Media). Separately, a US citizen in Chicago told Reveal agents scanned his face.

+ Show word diff

Documented misidentifications of US citizens (OregonA CBP official testified that the app returned two different, Oct 2025incorrect names for a woman detained in Oregon (404 Media). Separately, a US citizen in Chicago told Reveal agents scanned his face.

Why: 404 Media's Oregon report does not say the woman was a US citizen or give a month; Reveal's US citizen was scanned, not reported as misidentified.

Mobile Fortify: ICE and CBP's face-scanning phone app →

v3.31

Corrected

"Dying on Camera": two phrasings were stronger than the investigation

Was

138 California deaths, 81 in direct camera view. CBP has never audited tower effectiveness against deaths, and plans $1B for 1,497 more towers by 2034.

Now

At least 138 California deaths from 2022 through 2025 within a tower's nominal range, at least 81 of them most likely within a camera's field of view. CBP has done little to assess how its towers are working or how many people have died where they keep watch.

+ Show word diff

At least 138 California deaths from 2022 through 2025 within a tower's nominal range, at least 81 in directof them most likely within a camera's field of view. CBP has never audited tower effectiveness against deaths, and plans $1B for 1,497 moredone little to assess how its towers by 2034are working or how many people have died where they keep watch.

Why: Those are the investigation's words; "in direct camera view" and "never audited" went further than it does.

"Dying on Camera": migrants died in view of border surveillance towers →

v3.31

Corrected

ICE signed the shock-glove contract Aug 26, not Aug 27

Was

Dated Aug 27, 2026. $16.7M no-bid award to Compliant Technologies (KY) for 6,000 pairs of electric-shock gloves. Sixteen senators urged cancellation the same day; DHS called critics "despicable."

Now

Dated Aug 26, 2026, the signing date in the federal award record. Aug 27 is the day it was reported and the day sixteen senators urged ICE to cancel it.

+ Show word diff

Dated Aug 2726, 2026. $16.7M no-bid award to Compliant Technologies (KY) for 6,000 pairs of electric-shock gloves the signing date in the federal award record. Sixteen senators urged cancellationAug 27 is the same day; DHS called critics "despicable it was reported and the day sixteen senators urged ICE to cancel it."

Why: The USAspending award record gives the signing date as Aug 26, 2026; the earlier date came from news coverage.

ICE's $16.7M no-bid contract for electric-shock gloves →

v3.30

Corrected

Klein search counts: not three measures of different things

Was

Three different search counts measure three different things, not one contested number: about 45,000 total Flock queries across all purposes; "more than 10,000"; and more than 3,400 searches on a single plate over 10 months.

Now

The reported counts are given beside the official ones: about 45,000 (Yahoo/Newsweek; haveibeenflocked.com 45,318), 22,813 queries in the audit logs Lufkin PD released to us, and more than 25,000 non-law-enforcement inquiries per the District Attorney.

+ Show word diff

Three different searchThe reported counts measure three different things, not one contested numberare given beside the official ones: about 45,000 total Flock queries across all purposes(Yahoo/Newsweek; "more than 10haveibeenflocked.com 45,000";318), 22,813 queries in the audit logs Lufkin PD released to us, and more than 325,400 searches on a single plate over 10 months000 non-law-enforcement inquiries per the District Attorney.

Why: Lufkin PD's released logs and the District Attorney's release both count total queries well below 45,000, so the figures do not measure different things.

Lufkin, TX officer pleads guilty to 100 felony counts of Flock misuse; 5 years in prison per count →

v3.30

Doubt checked, claim holds

Judge Lin's Aug 27 ruling: 59 pages, "illegal and baseless"

Was

Sourced to news reports (CNN, TechCrunch).

Now

Checked against the order itself (N.D. Cal. No. 26-cv-01996, Dkt. 250): 59 pages, finding the broad measures "illegal and baseless."

+ Show word diff

Sourced to news reportsChecked against the order itself (CNNN.D. Cal. No. 26-cv-01996, TechCrunchDkt. 250): 59 pages, finding the broad measures "illegal and baseless."

Why: The court record was read directly for the Sept 25 D.C. Circuit update.

Pentagon vs. Anthropic: a district court vacates one designation, the D.C. Circuit upholds the exclusion →

v3.29

Corrected

Renée Good's killing was not a "confrontation"

Was

Renée Good (ICE, Jan 7, a vehicle-involved street confrontation, not a routine traffic stop).

Now

Renée Good (ICE, Jan 7, shot in her car as she backed up and then pulled forward steering away from the agent, moments after telling him "That's fine, dude. I'm not mad at you"; not a routine traffic stop).

+ Show word diff

Renée Good (ICE, Jan 7, a vehicle-involved street confrontationshot in her car as she backed up and then pulled forward steering away from the agent, moments after telling him "That's fine, dude. I'm not mad at you"; not a routine traffic stop).

Why: No source we hold describes a confrontation. The ICE agent's own video, published by Alpha News and captioned by The Washington Post, shows Good telling the agent "That's fine, dude. I'm not mad at you." ABC News' analysis of the videos shows her car backing up a few feet, then moving forward with the wheels turned away from the agent, just over a second before the first shot.

Fatal shootings of US citizens during Minneapolis immigration enforcement operations →

v3.29

Corrected

Norfolk's "similar case" is Porter, not Chatrie

Was

Norfolk says a similar case is pending elsewhere, without naming it. Working hypothesis, not confirmed: Chatrie v. United States.

Now

Norfolk named Porter v. United States, No. 26-5121, a pending Supreme Court petition on whether accessing plate-reader data is a Fourth Amendment search.

+ Show word diff

Norfolk says a similar case is pending elsewhere, without naming it. Working hypothesis, not confirmed: Chatrienamed Porter v. United States, No. 26-5121, a pending Supreme Court petition on whether accessing plate-reader data is a Fourth Amendment search.

Why: We read Norfolk's filing (Doc. 63) directly. It names Porter. Our working guess was wrong.

Norfolk points the Fourth Circuit to a pending Supreme Court petition on plate-reader searches →

v3.29

Corrected

The Schmidt amicus list was missing one brief

Was

Plaintiffs-side amicus briefs listed without the Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability.

Now

The Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability also filed for Plaintiffs-Appellants (Doc. 27).

+ Show word diff

Plaintiffs-side amicus briefs listed without theThe Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability also filed for Plaintiffs-Appellants (Doc. 27).

Why: A recheck of the Fourth Circuit docket found the brief we had left out.

Who filed briefs in the Schmidt appeal →

v3.29

Corrected

Norfolk's capture figure comes from an expert report that is now public

Was

Norfolk's more favorable capture figure rests on a sealed declaration, quoted as "top 5% of vehicles... photographed no more than once a day."

Now

The figure cites the report of Norfolk's expert, Valentin Estevez, refiled publicly with redactions (Doc. 180-1). The brief's full wording: "even the 5% of vehicles that were most photographed were on average photographed no more than once a day."

+ Show word diff

The figure cites the report of Norfolk's more favorable capture figure rests on a sealed declarationexpert, quoted asValentin Estevez, refiled publicly with redactions (Doc. 180-1). The brief's full wording: "topeven the 5% of vehicles... that were most photographed were on average photographed no more than once a day."

Why: The report was refiled publicly on Nov 21, 2025, which our earlier text missed, and our quote of the brief was shortened.

Norfolk's more favorable capture figure comes from its expert's report, now public with redactions →

v3.29

Doubt checked, claim holds

Why Norfolk cut Flock retention to 21 days

Was

30 days in 2024, 21 days by 2026; when and why not found.

Now

Norfolk's 2023 order set 30 days. A 2025 Virginia law (Va. Code § 2.2-5517) requires a 21-day purge, and Norfolk's General Order OPR-493 (June 30, 2025) adopted it.

+ Show word diff

Norfolk's 2023 order set 30 days in 2024,. A 2025 Virginia law (Va. Code § 2.2-5517) requires a 21 days by 2026; when-day purge, and why not foundNorfolk's General Order OPR-493 (June 30, 2025) adopted it.

Why: Both police orders (Schmidt Exhibits 16 and 18) and the statute were read directly. The earlier explanation was likely right; now it is sourced.

Norfolk's Flock retention: 30 days in 2024, 21 days after a 2025 Virginia law →

v3.28

Doubt checked, claim holds

IJ cancellation count confirmed at 227

Was

IJ Flock cancellation count now 224 as of Sept 21. Not corroborable; last confirmed figure 163 as of Sept 3, 2026.

Now

227 local governments as of Sept. 22, 2026, confirmed by direct fetch of IJ.org's own live database.

+ Show word diff

IJ Flock cancellation count now 224227 local governments as of Sept 21. Not corroborable; last confirmed figure 163 as of Sept 322, 2026, confirmed by direct fetch of IJ.org's own live database.

Why: The earlier figure outran our ability to verify it at the time. It was likely right, not wrong. The live database page, read directly, settles it.

227 local governments have canceled plate-reader contracts →

v3.27

Corrected

Klein's charged conduct runs to May 2026, not December 2025

Was

The alleged searches ran from July 2024 through December 2025.

Now

The 100 individually dated counts run from 07/31/2024 to 05/19/2026.

+ Show word diff

The alleged searches ran100 individually dated counts run from July 07/31/2024 through December 2025to 05/19/2026.

Why: The county register of actions, a primary court record, supersedes the next-day news report on the end date. The start date matched.

Lufkin, TX officer pleads guilty to 100 felony counts of Flock misuse; 5 years in prison per count →

v3.26

Corrected

The "K. Zac" Flock operator is Zachary Klein after all

Was

The haveibeenflocked.com operator "K. Zac" (45,318 searches) is almost certainly NOT Officer Klein, because the site's naming convention would render his name as "Z. Kle."

Now

"K ZAC" is Klein. USA TODAY's own database ties this exact operator, plate, and count to the agency investigation described in its article.

+ Show word diff

The haveibeenflocked.com operator "K. Zac ZAC" (45,318 searches) is almost certainly NOT Officer Klein, because the site. USA TODAY's naming convention would render his name as "Zown database ties this exact operator, plate, and count to the agency investigation described in its article. Kle."

Why: We treated "doesn't fit one site's naming pattern" as "is not this person," even though the site itself warns names don't always follow the pattern. A direct source settled it. How the name came to render as "K. Zac" is still not confirmed.

Lufkin, TX officer pleads guilty to 100 felony counts of Flock misuse; 5 years in prison per count →

v3.20

Corrected

Carson's five-year retention is the agency's choice, not Motorola's limit

Was

Carson, CA's Motorola ALPR system has a five-year retention period.

Now

Five years is Carson's own configured policy. Motorola's platform has no vendor-side retention ceiling at all. (v3.24 adds: LASD's written policy deletes at 5 years.)

+ Show word diff

Five years is Carson, CA's own configured policy. Motorola ALPR system's platform has a fiveno vendor-yearside retention periodceiling at all. (v3.24 adds: LASD's written policy deletes at 5 years.)

Why: The court order only said the data "was maintained for five years." We assumed a system limit without saying so. Motorola's own FAQ, fetched directly, says retention is set by the agency.

Culver City and Carson: federal court denies suppression of two ALPR systems →

v3.10

Corrected

The sixteen-state brief was filed June 18, not the day Chatrie was decided

Was

Sixteen-state brief filed June 29, 2026, the same day the Supreme Court decided Chatrie.

Now

Filed June 18, 2026, eleven days before the Chatrie decision.

+ Show word diff

Sixteen-state brief filedFiled June 2918, 2026, eleven days before the same day the Supreme Court decided Chatrie decision.

Why: The brief's own cover page and signature block read June 18. June 29 was the publish date of an article about it.

The sixteen-state brief leans on a two-camera, one-house case →Chatrie: the citations both Schmidt briefs lean on →Who filed briefs in the Schmidt appeal →

v3.8

Corrected

A citation we called dead was a wrong URL path

Was

footnote4a.org/blog/schmidt-amici does not exist as cited.

Now

The article exists at footnote4a.org/news/schmidt-amici. The domain was right; the path segment was wrong.

+ Show word diff

The article exists at footnote4a.org/blognews/schmidt-amici does not exist as cited. The domain was right; the path segment was wrong.

Why: A 404 means the exact URL is dead, not that the source is fabricated. We stopped at the first failed fetch.

Who filed briefs in the Schmidt appeal →

v3.8

Corrected

"Ankle monitor" is not the Norfolk judge's phrase

Was

The court rejected [the ankle-monitor] comparison.

Now

The phrase is a verbatim quote from Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle v. Baltimore Police Dep't (4th Cir. 2021), invoked in the Schmidt appeal's briefing.

+ Show word diff

The court rejected [phrase is a verbatim quote from Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle v. Baltimore Police Dep't (4th Cir. 2021), invoked in the ankle-monitor] comparisonSchmidt appeal's briefing.

Why: Checked against the district court opinion itself, which discusses Beautiful Struggle but does not use the phrase.

The "ankle monitor" line is from Beautiful Struggle, not the Norfolk judge →

v3.7

Corrected

One GAO report, not two

Was

GAO (2x): DHS lacks internal controls, privacy enforcement, oversight of surveillance tech.

Now

One on-point report: GAO-25-107302 (Dec 3, 2024), on bias risk and privacy protections for DHS technologies used in public.

+ Show word diff

One on-point report: GAO-25-107302 (2xDec 3, 2024): DHS lacks internal controls, on bias risk and privacy enforcement, oversight of surveillance techprotections for DHS technologies used in public.

Why: The only GAO product first located was a general management report with no surveillance content. A second search found the real one. It predates this timeline's 2026 window.

GAO: DHS lacks bias-risk policies for most public-surveillance technologies →

version not recorded

Corrected

The California Flock class action's case name

Was

Gibbs Mura v. Flock Safety

Now

Javorsky v. Flock Group, Inc., confirmed from the complaint itself.

+ Show word diff

Gibbs MuraJavorsky v. Flock SafetyGroup, Inc., confirmed from the complaint itself.

Why: The earlier name came from secondary reporting. The complaint's caption settles it.

Javorsky v. Flock Group: California class action over plate-data sharing →

version not recorded

Corrected

"Side door" belongs to the reporting, not the lawsuit

Was

The "side door" framing attributed to the Javorsky litigation.

Now

The mechanism is real, but the phrase appears to come from 404 Media and NPR reporting. Attributed there.

+ Show word diff

The "side door" framing attributed tomechanism is real, but the Javorsky litigationphrase appears to come from 404 Media and NPR reporting. Attributed there.

Why: The phrase does not appear in the complaint text searched.

Federal officials use local Flock access for immigration lookups →

v3.5

Corrected

ICE social-media monitoring: an RFI-stage plan, 28 people

Was

ICE hiring 30 social media workers.

Now

ICE is seeking contractors for an RFI-stage plan with 28 planned personnel across two centers (12 in Williston, VT; 16 in Santa Ana, CA).

+ Show word diff

ICE hiring 30 social media workersis seeking contractors for an RFI-stage plan with 28 planned personnel across two centers (12 in Williston, VT; 16 in Santa Ana, CA).

Why: "About 30" was journalistic rounding, and "hiring" overstated a contractor solicitation. Framing corrected v3.1, headcount v3.5.

ICE seeks contractors to monitor social media for deportation leads →

v3.5

Doubt checked, claim holds

Rep. Shontel Brown's Penlink letter is real

Was

Rep. Shontel Brown's Feb 19 Penlink letter is unverified.

Now

The letter is real, primary-sourced from shontelbrown.house.gov.

+ Show word diff

Rep. Shontel Brown's Feb 19 PenlinkThe letter is unverifiedreal, primary-sourced from shontelbrown.house.gov.

Why: Checked directly; the doubt was wrong.

Other pushback from Congress, security experts and community groups →

v3.4

Corrected

A tower-range statement was Anduril's, not CBP's

Was

CBP's Hilton Beckham said tower range varies with terrain and obstructions.

Now

That statement is Anduril's.

+ Show word diff

CBPThat statement is Anduril's Hilton Beckham said tower range varies with terrain and obstructions.

Why: Misattributed. CBP's and Anduril's statements have been attributed correctly since v3.4.

"Dying on Camera": migrants died in view of border surveillance towers →

v3.3

Retracted

Retracted: a CBP alert about civilian smart glasses

Was

CBP issued a May 2026 alert about civilian smart glasses.

Now

Retracted. It stays cut.

+ Show word diff

CBP issued a May 2026 alert about civilian smart glassesRetracted. It stays cut.

Why: No support found.

"CBP issued a May 2026 alert about civilian smart glasses" →

v3.0

Corrected

ICE's Clearview contract was signed in 2025

Was

ICE Clearview $9.2M contract, June 2026.

Now

Signed September 5, 2025.

+ Show word diff

ICE Clearview $9.2M contractSigned September 5, June 20262025.

Why: Date corrected against contract reporting.

ICE's $9.2M Clearview contract →

v3.0

Corrected

The Minneapolis shootings were not traffic stops

Was

Fatal shootings during traffic stops.

Now

Fatal shootings of US citizens during Minneapolis immigration enforcement operations: a vehicle-involved street confrontation (Good) and a man shot on foot while filming (Pretti).

+ Show word diff

Fatal shootings of US citizens during traffic stopsMinneapolis immigration enforcement operations: a vehicle-involved street confrontation (Good) and a man shot on foot while filming (Pretti).

Why: Neither was a routine traffic stop.

Fatal shootings of US citizens during Minneapolis immigration enforcement operations →

v3.0

Retracted

Retracted: a D.C. Circuit ruling that halted a DHS face database

Was

D.C. Circuit halted DHS nationwide FR database on Fourth Amendment grounds.

Now

Retracted as likely fabricated. Do not cite.

+ Show word diff

DRetracted as likely fabricated.C Do not cite. Circuit halted DHS nationwide FR database on Fourth Amendment grounds.

Why: It traces to one low-quality site with no docket number, a fabricated case name, and an uncorroborated quote.

"D.C. Circuit halted DHS nationwide face database on Fourth Amendment grounds" →

version not recorded

Doubt checked, claim holds

Section 702 lapsed June 12

Was

Section 702 lapse actually happened June 15, not June 12.

Now

Checked: the statute lapsed at midnight on June 12, 2026.

+ Show word diff

Section 702 lapse actually happenedChecked: the statute lapsed at midnight on June 15, not June 12, 2026.

Why: The challenge was checked and found wrong.

Congress lets the Section 702 spy law lapse for the first time →

This ledger begins with corrections recorded from v3.0 onward. Entries marked "version not recorded" were corrected in a pass whose number wasn't logged.